Source:
http://www.finanzainchiaro.it/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=6780
The German business magazine "Focus Money "(No. 2 / 2010), deals with a detailed narrative of 9 / 11 and put radically into question the official version. We are talking about the second week of a nation's economic economically stronger Europe, a magazine published by a German publishing giant, the group of Hubert Burda. The
signor Burda è un insigne esponente della superclasse globale, un editore-intellettuale di primissimo piano nell’establishment germanico: è leader della VDZ, la “confindustria degli editori”, nonché cofondatore dell’analogo sindacato su scala europea, ma è anche membro del Consiglio del World Economic Forum e ha partecipato perfino a riunioni dell’esclusivo Club Bilderberg.
L’uscita di questo articolo è dunque degna di attenzione: è la prima volta che un giornale così ben inserito nel mainstream occidentale si cimenta nel raccontare in modo talmente critico i lati più scomodi dell’evento che ha dato l’impronta al secolo, l’11 settembre.
"Focus Money", exposes the most crucial issues and contradictions in five glossy pages. Among other issues addressed, the article assumes that the collapse of the World Trade Center may have been a deliberate demolition.
addition, the article raises serious doubts about the "madness" attributed to personality criticisms, which are commonly stigmatized as "conspiracy theorists". The magazine points out that "it is not only serious politicians who do not want to believe the official version," but also "thousands of scientists who question the 11 / 9."
The author Oliver is Janice. He works as a freelance investigative journalist for the Financial Times Deutschland "," Sueddeutsche Zeitung "," Euro & Finance "and has a regular column for" Focus Money ".
Janice explains in his blog that has struggled for many years to convince the drafting of the need to publish these five pages. He wonders why the mainstream quietly hang in there, and try to answer: do not need a big media conspiracy to prevent them from publishing such stories, especially for large events. Every editor, according to Janice, has the fear of incurring the shame of repeating the injury of fake Hitler diaries, which greatly damaged in 1983 the weekly magazine "Stern". Janice describes this reluctance of his colleagues, to do with the size of the event, until, looking at the facts, my colleagues note that it is wrong not to ask questions. And so was born also Article 9 / 11.
The first page of the article shows photos of personality skeptical on '11 / 9 "official", "including Charlie Sheen, Sharon Stone, Rosie O'Donnell, William Rodriguez (next to George W. Bush), the 'Former Governor Jesse Ventura, Richard Gage, the German Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth and many others.
The rest of the article is full of references to a lot of information. The test of a controlled demolition of buildings, critical theory of the fire, questions about the interceptors on Building 7 WTC and the Pentagon. It speaks of the "flight maneuvers impossible," the resignation of Senator Max Cleland, who is quoted in saying "It's a scam, a national scandal," outraged by the tide of lies to the Commission, which has hampered the investigation. It also makes mention of the mysterious death of Barry Jennings, a senior official of the Department of Emergency Services of the City of New York. He was a key witness of what happened to Building 7. Still covered with dust, Jennings was interviewed live on ABC and then later in time for the documentary "Loose Change Final Cut" directed by Dylan Avery.
Just a few months ago, in early September, there was already a fair and balanced article about 9 / 11 in a German weekly TV.
The reasons for the article's publication of "Focus Money" is to understand. Maybe the editorial staff has independently decided to publish a story in itself interesting, now also a journal of that size is difficult to "give" to mean "alternative." And so a case could be tied to business decisions quotas.
can not be ignored, however, that the publication falls in a time when all the rhetoric has taken effect linked to al-Qa'ida in the wake of the strange pseudo-attack on the pant Boom Amsterdam-Detroit flight. That rhetoric is used liberally by the U.S. to support a renewed war effort in Afghanistan. Germany, too militarily involved in that area and very reluctant to expose themselves with more soldiers might be interested in starting to discredit the story background, starting from 9 / 11. Something similar has happened in Japan with the changing of the guard in the government, where the Japanese Democratic Party openly challenge the official version of the U.S. government on 9 / 11 and calls into question the ability to justify intervention in Afghanistan.
It may happen that the editors feel freer to report the doubts that had never dared to publish first, because they feared the chain of radical demands which they dragged with them in the power structure. Even within the ruling classes may open some debate about the fate of the world and not only military solutions. (Source: megachip.info)
http://www.finanzainchiaro.it/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=6780
The German business magazine "Focus Money "(No. 2 / 2010), deals with a detailed narrative of 9 / 11 and put radically into question the official version. We are talking about the second week of a nation's economic economically stronger Europe, a magazine published by a German publishing giant, the group of Hubert Burda. The
signor Burda è un insigne esponente della superclasse globale, un editore-intellettuale di primissimo piano nell’establishment germanico: è leader della VDZ, la “confindustria degli editori”, nonché cofondatore dell’analogo sindacato su scala europea, ma è anche membro del Consiglio del World Economic Forum e ha partecipato perfino a riunioni dell’esclusivo Club Bilderberg.
L’uscita di questo articolo è dunque degna di attenzione: è la prima volta che un giornale così ben inserito nel mainstream occidentale si cimenta nel raccontare in modo talmente critico i lati più scomodi dell’evento che ha dato l’impronta al secolo, l’11 settembre.
"Focus Money", exposes the most crucial issues and contradictions in five glossy pages. Among other issues addressed, the article assumes that the collapse of the World Trade Center may have been a deliberate demolition.
addition, the article raises serious doubts about the "madness" attributed to personality criticisms, which are commonly stigmatized as "conspiracy theorists". The magazine points out that "it is not only serious politicians who do not want to believe the official version," but also "thousands of scientists who question the 11 / 9."
The author Oliver is Janice. He works as a freelance investigative journalist for the Financial Times Deutschland "," Sueddeutsche Zeitung "," Euro & Finance "and has a regular column for" Focus Money ".
Janice explains in his blog that has struggled for many years to convince the drafting of the need to publish these five pages. He wonders why the mainstream quietly hang in there, and try to answer: do not need a big media conspiracy to prevent them from publishing such stories, especially for large events. Every editor, according to Janice, has the fear of incurring the shame of repeating the injury of fake Hitler diaries, which greatly damaged in 1983 the weekly magazine "Stern". Janice describes this reluctance of his colleagues, to do with the size of the event, until, looking at the facts, my colleagues note that it is wrong not to ask questions. And so was born also Article 9 / 11.
The first page of the article shows photos of personality skeptical on '11 / 9 "official", "including Charlie Sheen, Sharon Stone, Rosie O'Donnell, William Rodriguez (next to George W. Bush), the 'Former Governor Jesse Ventura, Richard Gage, the German Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth and many others.
The rest of the article is full of references to a lot of information. The test of a controlled demolition of buildings, critical theory of the fire, questions about the interceptors on Building 7 WTC and the Pentagon. It speaks of the "flight maneuvers impossible," the resignation of Senator Max Cleland, who is quoted in saying "It's a scam, a national scandal," outraged by the tide of lies to the Commission, which has hampered the investigation. It also makes mention of the mysterious death of Barry Jennings, a senior official of the Department of Emergency Services of the City of New York. He was a key witness of what happened to Building 7. Still covered with dust, Jennings was interviewed live on ABC and then later in time for the documentary "Loose Change Final Cut" directed by Dylan Avery.
Just a few months ago, in early September, there was already a fair and balanced article about 9 / 11 in a German weekly TV.
The reasons for the article's publication of "Focus Money" is to understand. Maybe the editorial staff has independently decided to publish a story in itself interesting, now also a journal of that size is difficult to "give" to mean "alternative." And so a case could be tied to business decisions quotas.
can not be ignored, however, that the publication falls in a time when all the rhetoric has taken effect linked to al-Qa'ida in the wake of the strange pseudo-attack on the pant Boom Amsterdam-Detroit flight. That rhetoric is used liberally by the U.S. to support a renewed war effort in Afghanistan. Germany, too militarily involved in that area and very reluctant to expose themselves with more soldiers might be interested in starting to discredit the story background, starting from 9 / 11. Something similar has happened in Japan with the changing of the guard in the government, where the Japanese Democratic Party openly challenge the official version of the U.S. government on 9 / 11 and calls into question the ability to justify intervention in Afghanistan.
It may happen that the editors feel freer to report the doubts that had never dared to publish first, because they feared the chain of radical demands which they dragged with them in the power structure. Even within the ruling classes may open some debate about the fate of the world and not only military solutions. (Source: megachip.info)
0 comments:
Post a Comment